{feed}

Video Internet - Stream Politburo

Recherche de vidéos [Politburo]
The EU - The New Soviet Union ?
AnonymousCommentator
5 mn - 12 oct. 2008


A chilling assessment of the European Union by A former dissident who was imprisoned in Soviet gulags for a total of twelve years has warned that he personally saw secret documents in 1992 which outlined a conspiracy to turn the European Union into a Socialist dictatorship. . For those of the eastern bloc countries who believe they are liberated from communism, you have a rude awakening. You have just joined a fascio-communistic organization called The European Union. Now, instead of state ownership of the means of production, it has been transferred to multi-national corporations, and central planned economy dictatorship coming now coming from Brussels instead of Moscow. . In a speech in Brussels last year, 63-year old Vladimir Bukovksy described the content of still classified Politburo and Central Committee documents. The Soviet files outlined a plan from the mid-1980's onwards to hijack the European Union and turn it into what Bukovksy calls the EUSSR, a totalitarian federal super state with no accountability or direct representation. The policy was "a conspiracy, quite openly made by them, agreed upon, and worked out." Bukovksy describes an amazing meeting between President Gorbachev and representatives of the Trilateral Commission, which included David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. Bukovsky was one of the first to expose the use of psychiatric imprisonment against political prisoners in the Soviet Union. He spent a total of twelve years in Soviet prisons, labor camps and in psikhushkas, forced-treatment psychiatric hospitals used by the regime as special prisons.A Fleeting Moment
xp1234567890
2 mn - 11 oct. 2008


Berlin, 10:30pm, November 9, 1989. Protest demonstrations broke out all over East Germany in September 1989. Initially, they were of people wanting to leave to the West, chanting "Wir_wollen_raus!" ("We_want_out!"). Then protesters began to chant "Wir_bleiben_hier", ("We're_staying_here!"). This was the start of what East Germans generally call the "Peaceful Revolution" of late 1989. By November 4, 1989, the protests had swelled significantly. In order to ease the complications, the politburo led by Krenz decided on November 9, 1989, to allow refugees to exit directly through crossing points between East Germany and West Germany, including West Berlin. On the same day, the ministerial administration modified the proposal to include private travel. The new regulations were to take effect on November 10. These regulations had only been completed a few hours earlier and were to take effect the following day, so as to allow time to inform the border guards. However, nobody had informed Schabowski. He read the note out loud at the end of the conference and when asked when the regulations would come into effect, he assumed it would be the same day based on the wording of the note and replied "As far as I know effective immediately, without delay". After further questions from journalists he confirmed that the regulations included the border crossings towards West Berlin, which he had not mentioned until then. Tens of thousands of East Berliners heard Schabowski's statement live on East German television and flooded the checkpoints in the Wall demanding entry into West Berlin. The surprised and overwhelmed border guards made many hectic telephone calls to their superiors, but it became clear that there was no one among the East German authorities who would dare to take personal responsibility for issuing orders to use lethal force, so there was no way for the vastly outnumbered soldiers to hold back the huge crowd of East German citizens. In face of the growing crowd, the guards finally yielded, opening the checkpoints and allowing people through with little or no identity checking. Ecstatic East Berliners were soon greeted by West Berliners on the other side in a celebratory atmosphere. November 9 is thus considered the date the Wall fell.USSR National Anthem
Tricyclejam
4 mn - 11 oct. 2008


The history of Russia between 1922 and 1991 is essentially the history of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or Soviet Union. This ideologically-based union, established in December 1922 by the leaders of the Russian Communist Party,[102] was roughly coterminous with Russia before the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. At that time, the new nation included four constituent republics: the Russian SFSR, the Ukrainian SSR, Belarusian SSR, and the Transcaucasian SFSR.[103] The constitution, adopted in 1924, established a federal system of government based on a succession of soviets set up in villages, factories, and cities in larger regions. This pyramid of soviets in each constituent republic culminated in the All-Union Congress of Soviets. But while it appeared that the congress exercised sovereign power, this body was actually governed by the Communist Party, which in turn was controlled by the Politburo from Moscow, the capital of the Soviet Union, just as it had been under the tsars before Peter the Great.Mahatma Modiji Tells Long Lying NDTV - Dont Lie. You Can Not Fool Indian People
IndianMediaZoom
9 mn - 10 oct. 2008


Modiji tells Long Lying NDTV - Dont run your channel through lies and deceit. You can not fool Indian people. (3:20 to 3:40) Mahatma Modiji also undresses the lies of Congress I (islamochurchist) and Hindu traitor lalu yadav, who manipulate Indian justice system to protect muslim terrorists for vote bank politics. We all know that christian communist prannoy roy and his pack of dogs and donkeys, vikram chandra, barkhat dutt et. al. paid to bark and bray at Hindus have been using deceit and lies for a long time trying to fool Hindus and undermine Hinduism and Hindu unity. Their actions have are part of the organized efforts to undermine the Indian Union and Hindu religion. The interviewer and the channel indeed comes across as most pathetic. In the Chakravyooh program, it was Mahatma Modiji who cages the host and easily owns him despite the host's trademark NDTV style opinionated braying. ON NDTV: Prannoy Roy, a churchist has close linkages with Marxists. He is a co-brother of Prakash Karat, General Secretary, Marxist Communist Party of India. His wife Radhika Roy is sister of Brinda Karat, Politburo Member, Marxist Communist Party. Prannoy Roy is a cryptochristian (someone who puts a Hindu name just for appearance) and his cousin Suzanne Arundati Roy is a christian that belongs to leftist lunatic fringe that seeks to subvert world and pushes a totalitarian agenda. And newshost Barkha Dutt, as a commentator inimitably argued is a trained pavlovian dog paid to bark at the wrong places. As we will establish in this channel, unlike what they claim, NDTV are neither unbiased nor reliable nor comprehensive. NDTV buys influence by shamelessly providing person of the year awards to ruling politicians and big businessmen. So much for its sophistication. Most of this media is staffed by people, that typically studied in christian missionary institutions, which build Macaulay's conception of "brown sahibs" - men and women Indian only in appearance but whose thinking has been polluted by looking at native Indian belief systems as backward and at best tolerate them as swish. All these media outlets have a track record of voluntarily censoring and suppressing news of christian and islamic terrorism while presenting as fascist any efforts by Hindus to organise themselves. In the news programs Indian media hosts will be invariably judgemental. The anti Hindu news media modus operandi follows: - Typically the news program host will have in their program a christian/muslim representative and a Hindu one (many times the media house invites only inarticulate Hindu members). - The media host will provide more opportunities for the anti-hindu member to speak: speak first and/or speak last and will provide him more byte time. - The media host while asking christian/muslim member to respond will be servile and will rarely if ever ask difficult questions and will accept the churchist/islamic rhetorical, empty assertions at their face value. - When the media host questions Hindu members, the questions will be loaded and usually after the Hindu member finishes speaking, the media host will provide a parting kick (having the last word) by damning the reasonable Hindu position. - Hindu organisations will be blamed for violence even when there is no evidence. Responsible journalism reporting ethics get considered and truth hidden only when churchist and islamic organisations carry out violence and many times violence done by islamic/churchist organisations condoned or censored. Suppressio Veri and Suggestio Falsi is their standard approach to Hindu organisations. - Another puerile game they play is when covering a terror attack, they will not use the i(i-slam) word. They will show some rare muslim victim and project as if muslims are the victims not perpetrators of terror. Indian media never ever does investigational stories on the millions of acres of land grabbed by church or muslims across India or the loud speakers that blare out obnoxious azaan noise from mosques that exceed by the large measure legally permitted sound levels. Churchist conversions of Hindus, which is illegal in states like Orissa through deceit and lies is never ever probed, let alone questioned? ((Note: church never ever targets poor muslims) This fooling around of Hindus and anti Hindu deceit by Indian media has gone on for too long. Edmund Burke is reported to have said "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." What can we do? - Write to the Corporations to not sponsor/advertise in these channels that show dual standards - Write to them that their association with these anti Hindu media outlets will be propogated. And all actions including boycott of their Products that are advertised on these channels would be initiated. - Make your friends, relatives and neighbors aware of the Anti Hindu bias, lies and deceit of these Indian media outlets.CPR 2816
archerofloaf
2 mn - 10 oct. 2008


CP RAIL2RR:3 Yeltsin File I
woodbineRed
8 mn - 3 oct. 2008


Gorbachev takes cautious steps to dismantle the roadblocks to reform, while Boris Yeltsin, Moscow's party leader, grows impatient and breaks ranks. Once friend to the Communist party, Yeltsin will soon tear apart the official line of perastroika. His actions were not without their consequences during the Second Russian Revolution. This is part of the award-winning documentary "The Second Russian Revolution", made in 1989-1991, at the same time the Soviet Union was undergoing complete social and political metamorphosis. It details the years following the death of Brezhnev, and rise and fall of Mikhail Gorbachev, up to the coup in 1991. The most amazing thing about it is hearing formerly party line-toeing aparachiks letting loose and speaking their minds. In an interview, producer Brian Lapping said, "When we first went to Moscow and said we were going to get the members of the Politburo to talk, journalists and heads of institutes in Moscow said that no one in the Politburo ever talks in public about whatever happens in the Politburo. They just don't do that. I still look back with amazement that we got several Politburo members to tell us stories of the inside events of the Gorbachev years. And in the end, the head of the KGB, who came to our launch party, said angrily to us, "Why did you not invite me to be part of your program?" To which I had to reply, "We invited you for 18 months, regularly phoning your office, and you would not talk us. That's why you are not in the program." (WorldScreen.com, 10/01) This series doesn't seem to be available in any form, unfortunately. It's a documentary masterpiece. Sorry about the poor quality video and missing bits--it's about 15 years old. Produced by Brian Lapping (Brian Lapping Associates Ltd)2RR:3 Yeltsin File II
woodbineRed
4 mn - 3 oct. 2008


Gorbachev takes cautious steps to dismantle the roadblocks to reform, while Boris Yeltsin, Moscow's party leader, grows impatient and breaks ranks. Once friend to the Communist party, Yeltsin will soon tear apart the official line of perastroika. His actions were not without their consequences during the Second Russian Revolution. This is part of the award-winning documentary "The Second Russian Revolution", made in 1989-1991, at the same time the Soviet Union was undergoing complete social and political metamorphosis. It details the years following the death of Brezhnev, and rise and fall of Mikhail Gorbachev, up to the coup in 1991. The most amazing thing about it is hearing formerly party line-toeing aparachiks letting loose and speaking their minds. In an interview, producer Brian Lapping said, "When we first went to Moscow and said we were going to get the members of the Politburo to talk, journalists and heads of institutes in Moscow said that no one in the Politburo ever talks in public about whatever happens in the Politburo. They just don't do that. I still look back with amazement that we got several Politburo members to tell us stories of the inside events of the Gorbachev years. And in the end, the head of the KGB, who came to our launch party, said angrily to us, "Why did you not invite me to be part of your program?" To which I had to reply, "We invited you for 18 months, regularly phoning your office, and you would not talk us. That's why you are not in the program." (WorldScreen.com, 10/01) This series doesn't seem to be available in any form, unfortunately. It's a documentary masterpiece. Sorry about the poor quality video and missing bits--it's about 15 years old. Produced by Brian Lapping (Brian Lapping Associates Ltd)2RR:3 Yeltsin File III
woodbineRed
9 mn - 3 oct. 2008


Gorbachev takes cautious steps to dismantle the roadblocks to reform, while Boris Yeltsin, Moscow's party leader, grows impatient and breaks ranks. Once friend to the Communist party, Yeltsin will soon tear apart the official line of perastroika. His actions were not without their consequences during the Second Russian Revolution. This is part of the award-winning documentary "The Second Russian Revolution", made in 1989-1991, at the same time the Soviet Union was undergoing complete social and political metamorphosis. It details the years following the death of Brezhnev, and rise and fall of Mikhail Gorbachev, up to the coup in 1991. The most amazing thing about it is hearing formerly party line-toeing aparachiks letting loose and speaking their minds. In an interview, producer Brian Lapping said, "When we first went to Moscow and said we were going to get the members of the Politburo to talk, journalists and heads of institutes in Moscow said that no one in the Politburo ever talks in public about whatever happens in the Politburo. They just don't do that. I still look back with amazement that we got several Politburo members to tell us stories of the inside events of the Gorbachev years. And in the end, the head of the KGB, who came to our launch party, said angrily to us, "Why did you not invite me to be part of your program?" To which I had to reply, "We invited you for 18 months, regularly phoning your office, and you would not talk us. That's why you are not in the program." (WorldScreen.com, 10/01) This series doesn't seem to be available in any form, unfortunately. It's a documentary masterpiece. Sorry about the poor quality video and missing bits--it's about 15 years old. Produced by Brian Lapping (Brian Lapping Associates Ltd)2RR:3 Yeltsin File IV
woodbineRed
6 mn - 3 oct. 2008


Gorbachev takes cautious steps to dismantle the roadblocks to reform, while Boris Yeltsin, Moscow's party leader, grows impatient and breaks ranks. Once friend to the Communist party, Yeltsin will soon tear apart the official line of perastroika. His actions were not without their consequences during the Second Russian Revolution. This is part of the award-winning documentary "The Second Russian Revolution", made in 1989-1991, at the same time the Soviet Union was undergoing complete social and political metamorphosis. It details the years following the death of Brezhnev, and rise and fall of Mikhail Gorbachev, up to the coup in 1991. The most amazing thing about it is hearing formerly party line-toeing aparachiks letting loose and speaking their minds. In an interview, producer Brian Lapping said, "When we first went to Moscow and said we were going to get the members of the Politburo to talk, journalists and heads of institutes in Moscow said that no one in the Politburo ever talks in public about whatever happens in the Politburo. They just don't do that. I still look back with amazement that we got several Politburo members to tell us stories of the inside events of the Gorbachev years. And in the end, the head of the KGB, who came to our launch party, said angrily to us, "Why did you not invite me to be part of your program?" To which I had to reply, "We invited you for 18 months, regularly phoning your office, and you would not talk us. That's why you are not in the program." (WorldScreen.com, 10/01) This series doesn't seem to be available in any form, unfortunately. It's a documentary masterpiece. Sorry about the poor quality video and missing bits--it's about 15 years old. Produced by Brian Lapping (Brian Lapping Associates Ltd)
Source:
Base de liens  |  Ajouter lien  |  Contact Rss
On est 25 visiteur(s) en ligne
Server 2.0